A Convenient Lie

April 20th, 2011

In a forum today, a troll had a genuinely interesting question:

What if vegetables had feelings or felt pain? How would the vegans cope?

I know, huh? Makes you think. Of course they’d cope somehow, right? You can’t eat rocks.

But the answer to me was immediately obvious. Most people can’t imagine not eating meat. So the question can be stated just as easily like this:

What if the animals you ate felt pain. How would you cope?

Easy answer, right? You have options! You could lie to yourself about the pain they feel, in which case you’d probably enjoy reading books by other people who deny the pain of animals and watch TV pundits go on about how scientists lie about animal pain. Or maybe you genuinely wouldn’t care, because you’re just insensitive. If you’re strong, you might accept that a bit of suffering is necessary and that your survival is more important than the suffering of animals. Weaker people might not be able to face that suffering, so they would avoid thinking about it, and accept the Bible’s excuse that god put them here for our amusement, clinging to a convenient lie, while others face the problem and live with it.

Which brings me to my question for you:

What if you knew that you were going to die some day. How would you cope?

Would you face the problem and live with it, or would you cling to a convenient lie?

Kindle, it’s not just a book. But is it Treason?

April 12th, 2011

I won’t buy a Kindle because Orson Scott Card is a big bully.

Kindles are supposed to be so much more than a book. Web browsing, messaging, and most notably updated annotations from the author, embedded advertising, and of course Amazon can delete any book at any time remotely. Sure, you can’t really loan your books out, not the good ones. But it’s so much more than a book!

Which is why I don’t own one. I really just want a book. Don’t get me wrong, I really want a Kindle, too. But, I also want control, and the two are mutually exclusive. This attitude really springs from a single experience where a book was taken from me by the ultimate bully: the author.

I used to have a copy of “A Planet Called Treason” by Orson Scott Card. I really liked it. It was a bit abstract, but also quite powerful. Eventually, as will happen with books, it fell apart and I wanted a replacement copy. When I went to buy a replacement copy, the book had been ruined by the author, and the original was no longer available. Orson didn’t just fix a few typos and add a paragraph, he completely rewrote the book, or as his web site puts it:

Treason represents a thorough, page-by-page reworking of A Planet Called Treason. Almost ten percent of it is completely original.

It changed so much that he had to rename it and sell it as a different book. Well, I bought and read it, and it’s not all that. The simple fact is that Orson Scott Card’s writing really went downhill at about the same time that he started letting fans download and read early versions of his books and tell him what to write. (On Compuserve! How cutting edge!)

As you would imagine, the author no longer wants copies of the original unrevised book sold. So they are not. Lest you think this is an isolated incident, I’d like to point out the Star Wars Special Editions, the only edition now available unless you have an ancient VHS copy. I guess some artists lose their artistic vision later in life and are then compelled to ruin their earlier masterpieces, perhaps as a form of revenge against a cruel life where inspiration, like youth, is a fleeting thing.

Kindle opens the door for this nightmare future, where you can lose books you’ve purchased even though you didn’t loan them out. Heck, you *can’t* loan them out, and they don’t wear out. But, you can still lose your favorite book, if it gets “revised” by the author. And this is a “service,” a big advantage to you, the book’s licensee. Because it is an e-book controlled by the publisher, you do not have control over the book, you don’t even have the right to read the original version any more.

Does Kindle work this way now? No, but it could.

For a list of other ways in which technology has failed to improve your quality of life, press 2.

COEXIST — Seriously?

April 11th, 2011

I like funny bumper stickers as much as the next guy. Which is to say, I enjoy the joke the first time I see a new one. And after that, not so much. But one bumper sticker I’ve been seeing lately continues to be funny no matter how many times I see it. It’s popular, apparently, among people who have never studied religion:

COEXIST

Wishful Thinking

That’s right, the COEXIST sticker. Here, posted without permission, is one of many nearly-identical-yet-copyrighted variations.

What’s wrong with this picture? For a start, you have a bisexual “e”, a letter I always thought was about as straight as they come, but I guess I shouldn’t be surprised. You can’t trust the alphabet, as I always say. “OEXIS” is mostly composed of religions that have a record of tolerating other religions.

But of course the beginning and end are two ancient enemies, the crescent and the cross. Only distance is preventing a harsh confrontation there. And their animosity doesn’t stop with their rivalry. Hippies (O) and bisexuals (E) are all that prevent the C from murdering the X and taking its land, and you just know T is horrified at the presence of the “satanic” dot on I. S practices ungodly meditation that can pull you from your faith, and both C and T would gladly gang up on E and stone it to death for its perversion.

I’m surprised these bumper stickers don’t spontaneously combust.